A commissioner insisted {that a} contractor take away a “white supremacist” image from his truck whereas he accomplished a job for the Metropolis. Sadly, she wasn’t anticipating his response.
Regardless of losing taxpayer cash by calling the police over trivial points on her off time, Portland Metropolis Commissioner Jo Ann Hardesty is openly anti-police within the public eye. In reality, she has proudly supported the “defund the police” initiative, smearing regulation enforcement as a powerful arm for white supremacy.
Given her hardline stance, it wasn’t any shock that Hardesty gave an ultimatum to a contractor when she was made conscious of a show she considers “deeply offensive.” Nevertheless, she was much more perturbed by the corporate’s response to her demand.
Jay Parasco, who serves because the secretary of a far-left non-profit group known as Avenue Roots, posted a photograph of the truck in query. Parasco notified Hardesty that the Oregon Concrete Options truck was displaying a greenback bill-sized Skinny Blue Line flag sticker, which he thought of unacceptable.
“Need to ensure @JoAnnPDX is conscious that @PBOTinfo is utilizing metropolis funding for Oregon Concrete Options to work on Hawthorne and thirty second whereas prominently displaying white supremacist symbols on their autos,” Parasco tweeted.
Hardesty and the Portland Bureau Of Transportation acted instantly, asking the contractor to take away the decal earlier than persevering with their work for the Metropolis, based on Pamplin Media. Nevertheless, after making an attempt to power the corporate into submission, Hardesty shortly realized she had no authority over the speech of a non-public contractor, and he knew his rights.
“My workplace and PBOT are conscious that the ‘skinny blue line’ flag is being displayed by a Metropolis contractor doing work for PBOTm” Hardesty wrote. “PBOT reached out to the contractor and requested them to not show the image whereas performing work for the Metropolis. Sadly, they declined, and we’re restricted in our skill to handle this challenge beneath our present contracts and insurance policies.”
In her clarification as to why she can not legally censor a non-public firm, Hardesty threw in some progressive propaganda falsely linking the Skinny Blue Line to the racist ideology of white supremacy. Likewise, she deceptively insinuated that opposition to the Black Lives Matter motion equates to white supremacy.
“The skinny blue line imagery is considered by many in our group as a logo of white supremacy that has been prominently displayed by people who oppose the Black Lives Matter racial justice motion and we perceive that is inflicting misery locally. You possibly can depend me as one of many many Portlanders that finds this imagery deeply offensive,” she wrote.
Hardesty mentioned that her subsequent focus might be “the dearth of variety in Metropolis contracts” in addition to initiating “a systemic overhaul” to root out hidden racism.
Most disturbingly, Hardesty overtly admits that she would censor residents if not for the First Modification. She means that those that disagree with the progressive agenda should be re-educated for the sin of wrongthink.
“On the finish of the day, it’s the values that this image represents that we should rise up towards. If the contractor took down this image solely as a performative measure after being requested by the Metropolis — it doesn’t change the hearts and minds of those that put it up. It’s as much as all of us to do the tough educating and organizing so that individuals can see the world extra empathetically,” she concluded.
Regardless of her anti-police stance, Hardesty has proven her hypocrisy by calling 911 on a Lyft driver who canceled the trip as a result of commissioner’s belligerent habits. Hardesty later blamed her concern of “white supremacists” and “being black in America” for her determination to name the police.
Hardesty continues to unfold propaganda in regards to the Skinny Blue Line flag. The image has nothing to do with race or non-public residents of any group. In reality, it has been in use because the Nineteen Fifties to point out help for regulation enforcement and honor these killed or injured within the line of responsibility.
It ought to concern each American, no matter political perception, that somebody ready of such energy is admitting to looking for a technique to circumvent constitutional rights with a purpose to impose their very own view.
